Residents of the outer suburbs like the green spaces and sense of community, but lament the lack of access to transport and other services
Residents of the outer suburbs like the green spaces and sense of community, but lament the lack of access to transport and other services. Photo by chuttersnap on Unsplash

Recent studies show Melbourne’s and Sydney’s fast-growing outer suburbs lag behind other parts of the city in access to urban design, employment and amenities and services that foster liveability.

Via The Conversation, by  (Research Fellow in Urban Studies, RMIT University), (Director, Urban Futures Enabling Capability Platform and Director, Healthy Liveable Cities Group, RMIT University),  (Vice Chancellor’s Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University), and  (Lecturer in Public Health, Australian Catholic University).

Disclosure statement: 

Leila Mahmoudi Farahani receives funding from The Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub as part of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Sciences Program and the Australian Research Council.

Billie Giles-Corti receives funding from the NHMRC as a NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellow, as the Lead of the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Healthy Liveable Communities, and through The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre; as well as The Clean Air and Urban Landscape Hub of the National Environment Science Program.

Cecily Maller receives funding from The Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub as part of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Sciences Program and the Australian Research Council. In the past she has received funding from the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth) and the Victorian State Government. She is a member of the Institute of Australian Geographers and a Fellow of the the Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).

Melanie Lowe does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

The National Growth Areas Alliance of local councils launched a national campaign, “Catch up with the outer suburbs”, on Monday. But what is it really like to live in these areas?

Living Liveable is a short documentary film produced by RMIT University researchers showcasing the lived experiences of residents in Melbourne’s outer suburbs. The film includes interviews with 11 residents that highlight their perceptions and experiences of liveability in their suburbs. This article explores their reasons for living where they do and recounts their experiences of life in the outer suburbs.

Why all the fuss about liveability?

Liveability and its underlying indicators have been the subject of substantial research. Most well-known liveability indices produced by the private sector — such as the Mercer Quality of Living Ranking and the Economist Intelligent Unit’s Liveability Index — rank cities against each other. And most Australian capital cities are ranked relatively high in such global liveability indices.

These measures overlook inequities within cities between established inner areas and newer outer suburban areas. Many of these urban fringe suburbs are experiencing rapid population growth. RMIT researchers have developed spatial liveability indicators, showing that residents in outer suburbs lack access to basic amenities that inner-city residents take for granted.

Yet residents’ perceptions of their neighbourhoods and their lived experiences are often unheard in such measures. The interviews show that a combination of factors shapes decisions to live in an outer suburb. These include perceived affordability, people’s aspirations for a good life, and access to public transport. As one resident said:

I was looking for an affordable area where I can, you know, buy a decent-size house within a decent budget and all those things. So, this area probably suits me, which is nearest for public transport, but yeah, it’s a bit far from the CBD area, which is alright. – male resident of Wyndham

Access to green spaces and a sense of community were among the things residents loved most about living in their suburb:

We live opposite a beautiful park … it’s right at our doorstep. We feel very, very lucky to live opposite this beautiful park, it’s very well maintained by the local council and it’s highly utilised. So even just out there walking, I’ve got to know people in my neighbourhood. – female resident of Wyndham

Traffic makes life worse

However, traffic volumes and poor access to daily living destinations and public transport had negative impacts on residents’ lived experiences. While current liveability indices usually consider access to daily living destinations – such as food outlets, schools, hospitals, and public transport – traffic is often overlooked. Yet, 10 out of 11 people mentioned traffic, in 30 separate instances, as something that makes their neighbourhoods less liveable.

You might also like:
– Search for rental properties in Sydney
– Search for rental properties in Melbourne
– Search for rental properties in Brisbane
– Search for rental properties in Perth

A painter living in the City of Casey described how increasing traffic in recent years was forcing him to wake up half an hour earlier and get back home half an hour later in the afternoon.

Lack of public transport or infrequent services also has negative impacts on residents’ quality of life and well-being.

I take my hubby to work in Derrimut and so that normally takes me … about two hours easy; just over two hours. … he doesn’t drive. He can’t use the train simply because the train doesn’t go anywhere near where he works. There’s nothing. No public transport to take my husband to work.

S0 … we’ve got no choice. So, if something happens to me, uh, we’re in a load of trouble. That’s where it’s difficult. We need more public transport. We really do. – female resident of Wyndham

Planners need to hear what residents say

The film highlights the gaps in current measures of liveability. For example, future liveability indices should consider including traffic and car-dependency indicators. Increasing traffic, the time spent travelling, and the financial burden of car dependency can detract from some of the key reasons residents choose to live in Melbourne’s outer suburbs – namely, affordability and sense of community.

We need to engage with communities and hear from them about their lived experience to better understand and measure their quality of life, their health and their neighbourhoods’ liveability. Objective measures of the quality of access should be accompanied by insights from residents about their lives in the suburbs. The voice of residents needs to be included in the planning of our cities as they grow, as well as the metrics of how successful we are in delivering equitable cities that foster healthy, affordable and prosperous lives for all.

You might also like:
– Melbourne or Sydney? This is how our two biggest cities compare for liveability
– Riding in cars with dogs: Transport policy needs to change
– 7 things to look for in a good neighbourhood
– Studying? 21 things to organise before your move

the conversation
The Conversation
https://theconversation.com + posts

This article has been reproduced with permission of The Conversation

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY